Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David D Holt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David D Holt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not establish notablility. No third party sources appear to be available either. Publishing books does not mean person is inherently notable. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 19:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of the current article even suggest minimal general notability. Notifying tagger Allthefoxes. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sources are his website an blurbs from publishers or retail sites related to his books. Not enough sources to demonstrate notability for a writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.