Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Barry (jailor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 03:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Barry (jailor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:GNG. No more sources found in online which can pass GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 02:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, India, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per above. Not notable enough. killer bee  05:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm curious as to why the nominator does not think that the five sources currently in the article are enough to pass WP:GNG. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a far as I can see the article does not indicate anything other than his occupation as a jailer at Cellular Jail and thus no notability aside from that. This would not seem to be enough notability for a stand alone article. An alternate possibility would be to redirect to Cellular Jail. Dunarc (talk) 23:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.