Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Barratt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Barratt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician with no viable third-party coverage. Article is a mess of promotional content and puffery backed by dubious sourcing (own websites, IMDb, and Amazon). sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 23:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, England, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: found no additional coverage. If The Beatles Complete On Ukulele gets kept at its AfD then redirect there instead. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable and promotional article. Darling ☔ (talk · contribs) 18:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional article with insufficient sourcing. Suonii180 (talk) 10:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.