Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bailey (cricketer, born 1943)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Cambridgeshire County Cricket Club List A players. Daniel (talk) 13:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Bailey (cricketer, born 1943)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another common name obviously wouldn't help, but two runs in one List A match is the very epitome of non-notability, with a hint of WP:BIAS as well. RobinCarmody (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Cambridgeshire County Cricket Club List A players Has played 1 List-A match, but no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another in a very, very, very long list of articles on cricket players that completely fail GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single List-A appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. --Ashley yoursmile! 18:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.