Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davey Morgan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Davey Morgan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Illustrator, professional photographer. As a photographer, he has his own wedding photography business, but nothing groundbreaking. As an illustrator, he's illustrated Bats in the Air, Bats in My Hair (up for being chopped at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bats in the Air, Bats in My Hair), by Martha Hamlett (was chopped at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Hamlett, up again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Hamlett (2nd nomination)), but apparently little else. Author is apparently the same as the other two. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC). As per the info in file:Radioshow32509.jpg, user:Sycondavey is Davey Morgan, so WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY applies. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Userfy. Does not yet warrant inclusion. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - besides not having any reliable sources, I don't see what makes this artist notable. Many of the links don't mention him; they appear to be randomly linked. For example, this church magazine doesn't even feature his work. While I'm sure he's a nice guy, and an up-and-coming young man, he's still just a run of the mill artist. What's worse, is that his name is so common, that searching for good sources on Google news is like trying to find a needle in the haystack. Bearian (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanispamcruftisement. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.