Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Scott (police inspector)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Scott (police inspector)[edit]

non-notable outside of his town. civic high flyers shouldn't make the cut. Plan8 (talk) 23:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Primal (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to pass WP:BIO. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm afraid. Doesn't pass WP:BIO at present. It may have been created by a fan of this person. Artene50 (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not passing WP:BIO Raymond "Giggs" K o 09:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are zero independent reliable sources in the article; article doesn't really even claim notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminx (talk • contribs) 05:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough. rootology (T) 15:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no claim to be notable --T-rex 23:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.