Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Long (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Long (actor)[edit]

Per WP:ENTERTAINER. PseudoChron (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, people on the Adult Swim forums are hoping he will act more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BenderRobot (talk • contribs) 15:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No, people on the Adult Swim forums are hoping he will act more.
Keep. Yeah, but why do you NEED to delete the article anyway? And WP:ENTERTAINER says an actor is notable if he has a cult following, and he'll shortly have one. BenderRobot 09:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Winning a bit part in a play doesn't make you notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence that a cult following, a la Susan Boyle, is incipient for this person. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO1E because the content is and can be expressed in Last Last One Forever and Ever, the episode's article. ZabMilenko^{How am I driving?} 09:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. A line or two can be added to the series/episode page, no need for a redirect. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per arguments above. He's already mentioned in Last Last One Forever and Ever and doesn't appear to demonstrate enough notability for his own article. Possibly shortly having a cult following is not the same as having one now. If and when he gets more notable, an article can be written.--Beloved Freak 18:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.