Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Bohman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Bohman[edit]

Dave Bohman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a coatrack of an article, but a local reporter who hasn't received any (as far as I can tell) meaningful in depth coverage. Merely interviewing notable subjects does not lend itself to notability and it doesn't appear he's won any awards that would qualify either. Praxidicae (talk) 18:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Is he Dan Rather? No, but he's had a long career in broadcast journalism, as an anchorman and investigative reporter, and he's had coverage here and here and here and here. Plus he's a recipient of Emmy awards and Emmy nominations here and here and here and here and here and here and here and this award. He represented the news industry as a panelist here. Overall, he meets the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I understand the nomination, but the Emmy nominations (even if they are regional Emmies) put him over the WP:GNG for me. Onel5969 TT me 18:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There is no question for me about this article - which is almost ref-bombed, but certainly well supported - and the research above takes care of notability for me.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.