Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Bass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Bass

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weakly sourced promotional article fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NMUSIC. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only secondary is a local radio covering it. Sounds like a cool musician but not notable in an Encyclopedic way. Bryce Carmony (talk) 07:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Updated content being added - will source/references to better conform. Thank you for your suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deeeyewhy (talk • contribs) 02:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC and is Promotional and lacks WP:RS third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's enough in these sources for a pass of WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. --Michig (talk) 07:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:BASIC and criteria #1 of WP:MUSICBIO: [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-It seems to be nicely sourced and does look overall like a person who does meet Wikipedia bios. Wgolf (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Could use some extra independent sources but clearly notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.