Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasein oedipus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per creator request. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dasein oedipus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Almost certainly a case of self-promotion and a conflict of interest (username of article author is the same as the author of the book) for a book that does not appear to pass WP:BK notability guidelines (no independent sources of information cited or found). ~Matticus TC 11:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possibly speedily as blatant advertising. Guy (Help!) 11:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator: this reads like an advert. Also, watch out for page blanking - it's happened once already. Charlie-talk to me-what I've done 11:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for breathtaking failure to establish notability. A Google search on the title produces 96 hits, the vast majority of which are blogs; the author's own promotional website is a free Geocities page. Suspect self-published or vanity press publisher. --Nonstopdrivel 13:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails WP:BK. Though published in Los Angeles, the Library of Congress holds no copies. A google search for "Vchira Publishing Group" receives not a single hit. The creation of a single purpose account. Victoriagirl 22:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - article creator attempted to blank the page; will take this as author-requested deletion, and so tagged. ~Matticus TC 23:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.