Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darra Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darra Singh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidance has been forthcoming establishing notabilty. Slatersteven (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete -If not deleted then article could be improved Thanks,User Talk:W.D. 19:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Weak Delete - I think the subject of the article could meet requirements, but currently as the article stands it should go (or have a large rework done). Joseph Steven (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Striking !vote by sock puppet of banned editor MooshiePorkFace --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As it stands, it should go per WP:BLP but, if it could be improved it may meet the requirements to stay, with more references to back it up .--Chip123456 (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and clean up if possible The article has sources to establish notability, but if it can't be cleaned up, delete—Wikipedia shouldn't allow poorly written articles to stand. ChromaNebula (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 'sources' are not independant, one is a biog from the company he works for ine is his biog on comment is free (in effect a blog), the third is at least independant, but looks like a directory entry, not an articel that established notabilty.Slatersteven (talk) 17:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Delete, bare rewrite/copypaste of this page, no good third party refs (one database entry and one article by him, zero about him, may fail GNG). Hairhorn (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on commentary provided by Hairhorn. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.