Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darla Crane (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : the consensus is delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Darla Crane[edit]

Darla Crane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted many years ago but was recreated after some adult award nominations. Since PORNBIO has been changed to remove this criteria we are left again with a BLP that lacks reliable independent sources and fails both GNG and the lower hanging fruit of PORNBIO Spartaz Humbug! 10:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'm not voting just yet. I've made a first pass to add some material and will be working on this article again as time permits. I find it hard to believe that we can't find more information about a performer with a 20+ year career, but if not so be it. She is known for her Bettie Page impersonation and style of modeling that includes some BDSM work like Page did so maybe thats an avenue to investigate for sources. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator's spot-on analysis. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.