Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkbattle
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per A7. Xoloz 16:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Darkbattle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Darkbattle search string ()
No assertion of notability, possible A7. Previously deleted through PROD, contested, and restored. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete No assertation of notability--indeed, much of the "community" section text is an assertation of non-notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an active Wiki for the web site www.darkbattle.com. This shouldn't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.144.43.44 (talk) 20:06, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
- Here are some mentions of Wikipedia at darkbattle.com. -- Jreferee (Talk) 22:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete no assertion of notability. Eusebeus 20:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - The DRV request states "has a large fan base." However, that is not enough to satisfy the "assertion of importance/significance" criteria of WP:CSD#A7. Story.darkbattle.com does not give any idea of its importance/significance. I found no independent reliable source material on the topic, not even a mention in passing. I was going to search some of the alternate newspaper sites, but could not figure out where Darkbattle was based. Only seven blogs even mention darkbattle (see Google blog search). Speedy delete seems appropriate. -- Jreferee (Talk) 22:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't exactly understand everything that is currently happening, although it seems that there is a popular choice among the advanced users who have contributed to the discussion. Thank you for alerting me of this Jreferee. Emerlock 07:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.