Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Judges
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – sgeureka t•c 16:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dark Judges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional group/organization. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Some of the most notable characters in the Judge Dredd universe covered in multiple storylines. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- That's "in-universe" notability. You need to demonstrate independent, real-world notability. 'Delete. --Nicknack009 (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - None of the sources in the article are used to establish notability. In-universe presence is not an indicator of notability. TTN (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fictional. Not a shred of analysis. Pure PLOT. Fails GNG and NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 11:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.