Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Intervals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per G11 by User:JzG--JForget 01:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Intervals[edit]

no Notability found triwbe (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A WP:COI article that fails WP:FILM, WP:RS, WP:N and has no encyclopedic content. --Pmedema (talk) 11:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. A screenplay which has been optioned by a potentially non-notable director [1]. Comprehensively fails WP:NFF, and lacks any semblance of notability. Incidentally, the E.B. Hughes article appears to have some pretty severe COI issues as well. PC78 (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, the guy appears to be creating articles for pretty much everything and everyone he has been involved with. I think we have a problem here. PC78 (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I declined the speedy deletion tag, just because I found it very difficult to work out what the article was about. Given the context I thought it possible that the subject of the article was worthy of inclusion, but that the text was badly written by the author. See also the contributions of this author. They appear to be self-promotion/conflict-of-interest. - Richard Cavell (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising of a topic not meaningfully covered by reliable sources. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete no context. will re-tag ukexpat (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.