Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Cuts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Cuts

Article about an album, not sure it is notable? Google comes up with practically no relevant hits. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 02:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only ghits are eBay, Amazon and the like, no significant coverage no RS Lets drink Tea 02:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not a notable compilation, per WP:MUSIC broadly read. --TeaDrinker (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Article possibly plagiarized as well. Doesn't appear to have been written from scratch.Bildstit (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Striking out !vote of a sockpuppet of a banned editor. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As unremarkable album, per WP:MUSIC#Albums. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 05:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, non-charting compilation album that does not even have a listing on allmusic.com. Untick (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.