Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Alex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Kubigula (talk) 05:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Alex

Previously deleted as Dark AleX (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark AleX), re-creation speedily deleted by me. Upon the creator's request, I have undeleted the page for a re-consideration (see deletion review). Procedural nomination - no vote. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and stubify. The intro, and probably a little of the body text, is pretty good, but much of the content is coatracking for his hacks or other things. That, combined with almost a lack of sources after the intro, leads me to believe that this information probably shouldn't be so detailed. Notability overall looks pretty good. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with this. — brighterorange (talk) 16:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (assuming I am allowed to vote, considering it was me that requested the deletion review and so it is pretty obvious how I would vote). As a casual wikipedia user I did not realise the extent to which the page had evolved since I made it and I accept there are parts which need editing now. However, deletion is unnecessary in my opinion as Dark Alex is far too important to the PSP scene. Are users allowed to start editing the article while this review is active? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skip1337 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, you are. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, articles for deletion are more a debate than a vote; so yes, you can have your opinion heard. And yes, you can edit the page while it is being considered here, as long as you don't remove the deletion notice or make other disruptive edits. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Cool, thank you. I see one of the other contributors to the page isn't as hot on full stops as me. The actual content I'll think about at the weekend, but I can do quick things (minor edits) now. Skip1337 (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion. Uncle G (talk) 18:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep meets WP:BIO. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Probably ~~one of~~ the most notable name associated with the PSP who is not employed by Sony. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - coverage seems to indicate notability. matt91486 (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very famous in homebrew scene and spain police is hunting him. --Ciao 90 (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.