Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darin Raffaelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 17:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darin Raffaelli

Fails notability for biographies since June 2007. No references. Magioladitis (talk) 15:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources, no article. Plain and simple. I'm surprised this had to be relisted even. JBsupreme (talk) 06:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Superchargers released two records on Estrus Records according to Allmusic, which makes the band notable per WP:MUSIC. His strong involvment with The Donnas, which can be decently sourced, pushes him to a Weak Keep I say. I'll add some references to the stub, to source what's there. --Amalthea^Talk 13:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added several references as well; it turns out he was mentioned in newspaper articles about The Donnas a fair bit. But his article is not a strong candidate for a merge to The Donnas given what Amalthea has found. (It appears that Wikipedia needs the article Supercharger (US band).) So I am left saying keep. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of reliable sources are already in the article, with exception to http://www.grunnenrocks.nl/people/r/raffaell.htm coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 20:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.