Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daria Schirman
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Daria Schirman[edit]
- Daria Schirman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. XXN, 20:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep -- see for example this coverage in Ladies in the Laboratory IV: Imperial Russia's Women in Science, 1800-1900. A woman scientist of 19th century were few and far between. More sources are likely to exist in Russian. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep in the hope that someone will be able to improve this. I struggled in writing Vera Danchakoff and I confirm what K.e.coffman says. In these situations verifiability is more important that what we unfortunately call "notability". Thincat (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per K.e.coffman. Hmlarson (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.