Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dante Micheli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dante Micheli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Football player stub which lacks notability, verifiability and has no benefit to wikipedia. Monkeymanman (talk) 01:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - According to playerhistory.com, this guy played in Serie A for nine straight seasons in the 1960's and played a lot of matches which means that the article passes WP:NFOOTY. Article needs improvement, not deleting. --Mentoz86 (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep - He played in a major international final. Clearly notable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs bringing up to meet WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 11:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Played in a winning European Cup-Winners Cup side, which is about as highly notable as could be. I added a reference on this (see also this lovely high-boot picture from that final: [1]). AllyD (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. This is a very odd nomination indeed; perhaps another time, the nominator should consider the requirements of WP:BEFORE. Subject has played on the winning side in a European final, as noted above, and has more than 250 appearances in the Italian Serie A, one of the world's strongest football leagues. The it.wiki version is well developed and very well sourced, making the subject's notability abundantly clear. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as a clearly pointy nomination. Monkeymanman's editing history shows that he is familiar with the subject matter, so this isn't a case of a merely ignorant nomination. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep and speedy close, bad faith nomination. Cavarrone (talk) 17:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I should add some detail as to why I nominated this article for deletion. The original article had a solitary line of information which could clearly be interpreted from the 1961 CWC final article (the sentence basically stated he played in the final) therefore it was irrelevant and in no way informative for Wikipedia. There were also no sources. At least now a helpful editor has rectified the problem. In light of the new sourced material I would not have nominated the article for deletion. Monkeymanman (talk) 08:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Hmmmmmm... See above! - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.