Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dante's Inferno Documented

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 20:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dante's Inferno Documented

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any reliable sources to establish the notability for this unreleased film. The film's official website seems to indicate that the finished film has not yet been selected for screening at any festival. Steamroller Assault (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I checked out the film's website and this seems to be the project of one person. It might become notable after it is released, but not yet. Borock (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It does seem like a do it yourself project. Actually very cool but not much to say about it when the only source is the project itself. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NotJustYet. I grant a little personal interest as I was friends with Jeff Conaway, knew of his participation, and was aware of both his input and interest into the project and its topic. And while an independent project, it is not quite the product of just "one" person,[1] and considering content and involved actors it is expected to do well at festivals upon the release of its full version in November 2011.[2] Principle filming has completed, a earlier and shorter version has already screened, and a 14 minute preview (not a trailer) is up.[3] Information about the production IS available,[4][5][6] But it does not have the depth of coverage to merit being an exception to WP:NFF. Also, and due to its primary cast, we should expect far more coverage in Italian-language sources, than English. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.