Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dano Cerny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources provided by SomeoneNamedDerek have shown notability and the nominator supports keeping, with no additional delete comments after that. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dano Cerny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The links on the page are to music videos and contain no biographical information about the subject person XyzSpaniel Talk Page 13:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable music video director. The music videos themsevles are primary sources, we need secondary sources.
Delete: Article not organized, nonconstructive article published to main space.This article needs construct.--Historical Ben (talk) 21:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC) WP:SOCK vote struck ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Historical Ben: An article being needing general cleanup is not always a particularly strong rationale for deletion, although such rationale can apply at times. Of note is that the article was cleaned-up and organized after being nominated for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While the article needs a lot of improvement, Cerny is a notable music video director and has worked with popular artists such as those listed on the article so far. A Google search produces 335 results, but many of these results are from reliable sources, including Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, and Stereogum, among others. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Keep Now that the article has been considerably improved and referenced by SomeoneNamedDerek XyzSpaniel Talk Page 10:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.