Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Hilton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Early close, could have been speedied probably, too :) SarahStierch (talk) 21:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Hilton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability is present or asserted. Also there are no reliable sources present or available -- no arm's-length third-party expert sources that state that Mr. Hilton has any notability with respect to other members of his profession. Ubelowme _U ^Me 20:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I declined this A7, but I still can't believe Hilton is notable. No reliable sources are provided to establish that he is. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe I'm just unnerved by all these beautiful people glowering out of the screen but I'm failing to find him even on the modelling site that is offered as the sole reference? Without that, it is an unreferenced BLP. And with it, the fact that someone is working with an agency is hardly evidence of notability. It's just a job like any other. AllyD (talk) 22:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article indicates that he is also a "socialite" but I found no reliable sources to corroborate that either. Ubelowme _U ^Me 22:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zippy was correct for declining the speedy. Modeling for the magazines listed is enough to pass A7, but fails WP: NMODEL, as they are not considered "mainstream media". Electric Catfish 14:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, no evidence of notability. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.