Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Cevallos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Cevallos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noticeable enough. Google News returns no result. Northern Moonlight | ほっこう 02:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete google does return some results and it is relatively to verify this individual is what the article claims. However, it it seems to fail WP:GNG, he just doesn't seem significant. Also, I watch MSNBC and don't recall seeing him- though this bit is anecdotal. Also, the creator of the page user:editor459 seems to be a one trick pony of sorts. Tautomers (talk) 03:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we lack enough indepth sources that are indepdent and reliable and truly about Cevallos to justify having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG.--Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: just another talking head. Tautomers, I've seen him on TV, and he made sense to me, but that's by-the-by. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Drmies. Had a look for sources but they were all just mentions of pieces written by him, not about him. If we had List of MSNBC reporters, I could entertain a redirect, but we don't. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just not notable.Jackattack1597 (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem to be notable enough to justify an article. Philipnelson99 (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DON'T Delete Is this for real? Cevallos is a national media figure. Removing his page would be absurd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5c2:300:62e:1802:1de0:663a:28f5 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC) — 2601:5c2:300:62e:1802:1de0:663a:28f5 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Fails GNG BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.