Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danni Watson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danni Watson[edit]

Danni Watson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source analysis as of this revision: 1, database; 2, short Q&A; 3, trivial mention; 4, database; 5, team roster, no coverage; 6, not mentioned; 7, passing mention in an individual match report; 8, trivial mention; 9, possibly significant, though heavily quotes the subject; 10, deadlink; 11, deadlink; 12, not independent and not significant; 13, team roster, no coverage; 14, not mentioned; 15, says the subject received an award but no prose coverage at all; 16, mentions a scholarship grant, probably irrelevant; 17, mentions the subject as the recipient of a junior award (at age 15 or 16), but with no prose coverage and probably failing WP:YOUNGATH.

The coverage is insufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. Avilich (talk) 01:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Questions (and delete) Okay, this feels strange, almost as it is written like a CV, self-written, WP:PROMOTIONAL, etc. Govvy (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.