Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danity Kane's Third Single

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 00:33Z

Danity Kane's Third Single[edit]

not enough info, no title, no confirmations cited, another speculation article from same person

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL - speculative, unverified, uncertain. Walton monarchist89 19:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per those above. When one of the options is confirmed as the single (rather than a number of different choices being potential singles) and gets released, we have an article on our hands. Not before. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only source is a forum. And even if the source were reliable, there doesn't need to be separate article saying that the next single will be one of three songs; rather, there would be a brief mention in the Danity Kane article. ShadowHalo 00:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Ditto. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me} 01:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.