Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danita Johnson Hughes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danita Johnson Hughes[edit]

Danita Johnson Hughes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable executive and author. The books are self-published--see WorldCat [ww.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=Danita+Johnson+Hughes]. The awards areboth local and trivial. The references are just local publicity, except 1. which is a mention 2. Kirkus, which is an unreliable source for self-published books--they review them only if the author pays. 3. which tho a major station is still local and a interview clearly for promotional purposes. DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- a glorified CV and a sales prospectus. Whenever I see "professional speaker" in the infobox and / or lead, there's a strong suspicion that the article has been created for promotional purposes. Wikipedia is not a free "speaker bureau" to be used to solicit speaking gigs for nn individuals. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This person got her doctorate from an online university. The puffery therein asserts she's a "certified trainer and speaker" yet I'm unaware of any such recognized credential. Wikipedia is a charity, not a free web host for speakers seeking fees. Bearian (talk) 23:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.