Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 19:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danish Brazilian

Yet another Brazilian ethnicity article with no significant content, no sources, and no population estimate. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgian Brazilian and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourgian Brazilian for other nominated articles in this genre. I recommend a delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article doesn't show why this would be a notable term. Seems to me like it has as much sense as listing possible nationality combination. --Twinzor (talk) 07:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- This ceaseless flood of Brazilian ethnicity articles is getting tedious. Brazil + another country does not equal an article. Reyk _YO! 10:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 11:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am Brazilian and I say this community is not notable in my country. Zero Kitsune (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)*Delete please someone block this user's account for consistent, disruptive absuses of Wikipedia.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also see North American Brazilian which is similarly empty. JuJube (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails to establish notability. Punkmorten (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete I see no point in claiming pseudo-notability for any arbitrary combination of two nationalities, be one of them "Brazilian" or not. What next? Irish Japanese? Spanish Australian and introducing acoustic Australian? Where will it end? I say it should end here, with block-deletion of all such articles which don't have established notability. -- Korax1214 (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unworthy. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.