Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Post

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no indication of the person's notability. Jamie^☆S93 15:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Post[edit]

I don't think regional reporters often meet wikipedias criteria for notability, I certainly can't find any evidence in the text this reporter is yet suitable to be included with her own page LaurenOats (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of significance or importance even in relation to other news reporters. Drawn Some (talk) 17:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero evidence of notability provided. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 07:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.