Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Morse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 05:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Morse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, no sources suggesting WP:N even after looking through various sources. Only brief one-sentence remarks or references at best. Reads as promotional and one of the users who created the article might have been a gallery that hosted the artist. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Illinois. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DaffodilOcean (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, that her paintings are exhibited in some of the best-known buildings in Chicago goes to notability. The sources also seem enough. Seems a fixture in the Chicago art scene, no small accomplishment. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Confused as to which of the sources you think satisfy WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Just because someone's art is placed in a high traffic location does not, alone, make them notable, unless others are talking about it. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of any kind of sourcing. JStor has nada, Gscholar has links to articles about oxygen research in cells, Gnewspapers talks about a dragon fairy getting wings in a school play. No critical attention for this artist. Oaktree b (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and the photos of her artwork are likely copyvios. Tagged as such. Oaktree b (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did all the usual searches and found noting at all to establish notability. CT55555(talk) 00:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My understanding of WP:NARTIST is that it requires multiple works in public places such as museums, galleries, trains stations, and public squares. Have some artwork in a private building is not sufficient, because lots of artists have works that are in private collections. Also, unless someone can find multiple good sources with in depth coverage, this is likely to be deleted based on generic WP:GNG issues. Chicago is a major art center - I follow a friend who posts all his Windy City gallery outings on Facebook. However, having art shown in a major art scene is not automatic notability. Ping me if you find and add it per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.