Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Vladař

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Vladař[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 03:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: (sighs) Another NN substub hockey article, and I'm almost at the point of writing WP:DOLOVISCREATEDIT into WP:COMMONOUTCOMES. Somewhat brazenly (and neither for the first time or the fiftieth time), he set forth that the "honours" qualifying this mid-minors goalie with no distinction for an article was participating in the Hlinka tournament and in junior amateur championships, despite all-but-unanimous and ongoing consensus that such explicitly didn't meet the requirements of NHOCKEY. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence that the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 12:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This one is way too soon. Deadman137 (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still questionable for any necessary improvements, delete until a better article is available. SwisterTwister talk 22:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.