Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ribarovski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ribarovski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable author. Google finds only 13 hits for his name, and 4 for the book with his surname. No source for claim being an "approved source" and none found on google. noq (talk) 13:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete writer whose book does not seem to have gotten enough notice to make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 21:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All the media coverage of him seems to be as a 'local boy who did good'. He seems to have broadly become a private citizen, and is not wiki-notable in his present occupation. According to NLA Trove his book isn't held very widely, most holdings are legal deposit libraries. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 05:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, getting a book published is an achievement, but in this case it seems to be one of the many published works that didn't attract wide notice. Being held in the NLA collection is not an indicator of notability; as every book published in Australia must be sent there through legal deposit. Best of luck to him if he continues to write, but the sources aren't there right now to write a full, accurate, and NPOV biography of him. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 23:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.