Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pickering (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only "keep" is by an SPA. Sandstein 18:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pickering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single source in the article contains more than the most cursory passing mention of the subject. There appear to be no examples of in-depth, significant coverage available. Subject does not meet WP:NCREATIVE or WP:NBIO. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sourcing to show he is a notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was tending towards keep based upon reading the article but then I checked all of the refs and none of them are about him. Szzuk (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Creator of notable TV programs as well as production company. User:Mark Williams222254 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Williams 222254 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.