Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Mathews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 02:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Mathews

Appears to be non-notable. No Google reference to the Indian Immigrant Initiation. Several to Daniel Mathews but do not appear to be in reference to this particular one. CambridgeBayWeather 05:06, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

• This is very offensive to the two members of the community who decided to publicly acknowledge Daniel and his efforts. We will be continuing to upload more information on both Daniel and the Indian Immigrant Initiation. -- Geordanh 10:28, 2 October 2005
  • KEEPGeordanh 06:18, 3 October 2005 (UTC) Geordanh
  • We have finished putting up the page on the Indian Immigrant Initiation, please read through that if it is any form of cross reading you are seeking to learn about. Geordanh
  • Can we yet remove the deletion tab? It makes the article look like it is made by some hoodlums Geordanh
    • comment Wikipedia is (or: tries to be) an encyclopedia, not a place where dedicated community service is rewarded by public acknowledgement. I suggest you create a webpage for him. --Aleph4 10:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete appears to be bogus article. MONGO 06:20, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Unable to find any independent references to show notability. --GraemeL ^(talk) 13:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable. Dlyons493 Talk 14:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. While this initiative sounds commendable, there are no third party sources to verify this information. If the author/s could cite sources such as media coverage to verify this information, it would be a different case. Capitalistroadster 17:59, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable. Xoloz 12:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN --Rogerd 09:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.