Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Kolev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Kolev[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable - 8 year old footballer. Fails notability guidelines at WP:Athlete noq (talk) 18:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I contested speedy deletion because there was a claim of importance, and the birth date could have been a typo, but the claim to play for Slavia Sofia isn't backed up by the the team's web site, and on further reflection I suspect that "Slavia Sofia 2001" is the Bulgarian equivalent of what would be called in England "Slavia Sofia under-9s". There is a Kolev playing for Slavia, but his first name is Todor. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 10:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per failure of WP:ATHLETE Spiderone 12:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Geschichte (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have tagged this for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G7 as the author and sole contributor has blanked the page. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.