Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Janssen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Janssen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nice resume, but I am not seeing anything here that adds up to notability, nor am I seeing anything but sparse mentions in news reports (amid a handful of other clearly different people with the same name). BD2412 T 06:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this resume. The article makes no assertion of notability, and I can't find anything that might help to make one. Fails WP:GNG utterly. FalconK (talk) 05:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing even close to meeting notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTRESUME and WP:MILL. This snuck through in the wild west of 2006. Bearian (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.