Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Foa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Foa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two non-notable young businessmen, articles created by User:51Give, which is the name of their "social entrepreneurship business." The most significant coverage I can find on either of them in anything like a reliable source is a one-sentence mention in China Daily (Google Translate version here). Is 51Give a WP:NOBLECAUSE? Maybe, but its principals are not there yet in terms of notability. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Both articles read like CVs. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete * looks like spam to me. JBsupreme (talk) 21:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very close to a speedy deletion as G11 for being exclusively promotional. DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless we are hosting resumes now. Xenophrenic (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.