Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Dukes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Dukes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability apart from his manner of death. The article has a few more references compared with the first version that was AfD'd, but there is no material difference in the level of notability. Acroterion (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I said so in the first AfD, and I say so now. This is a "one event" biography. Attention came to him only because he was killed by a notable orca, Tilikum (orca). The death is already covered in the proper place, the article about the orca. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete This article does not appear to present any pertinent information that could not be included in Tilikum (orca) . Eatmark (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Eatmark[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see how this person, or his death, would be considered notable by any stretch. Bearian (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.