Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Bolton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 03:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Bolton[edit]
- Daniel Bolton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My listing this article does not constitute a !vote on my part: I have not reviewed the article at all. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]This article is nominated as a contested prod. This person is not notable and there has been no attempt to establish notability at all.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability is not inherited, and it seems that the only reason this article was created was because the wrestler in question briefly was signed to one of WWE's development territories. — Richard BB 22:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The key word in Richard's comment above is briefly because he wasn't even employed in the developmental territory that long by the looks of it. The subject just seems to all around fail to meet GNG.LM2000 (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think like LM2000 --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.