Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danial Schon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Schon Properties. Redirecting seems the logical conclusion based on the discussion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danial Schon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG.. cited sources only namechecking the subject. couldn't find source which can demonstrate the notability of the subject . Saqib (talk) 07:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nomination - fails WP:BIO, with no evidence of independent notability in secondary WP:RS. His company might turn out to be notable, but WP:Notability is not inherited. I can see his name mentioned in passing some controversies about the company online, and that's about it. Uncle Roy (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: He probably is notable. 8th richest Pakistani with personal wealth of 1 billion per one of the sources in the article. However since his activity is in Dubai and Pakistan, non-English coverage is probably key. I am not going to look these up in this case (outside my expertise), but unless he is a "Closet billionare", he probably has WP:SIGCOV in at least non-English sources.Icewhiz (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, f e minist 10:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Subject is also mentioned in The National, The Nation and here. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 09:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

name checks. --Saqib (talk) 09:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A new account has just attempted to systematically replace all mentions of Danial with Asher Schon, including on the rich list article, without any explanation or credible sourcing. Existing sources make no mention of "Asher" (but there is at least some mention of Danial). This seems quite suspicious to me, a possible hoax or something? Murph9000 (talk) 07:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please assess whether edits after May 27th, which added multiple new sources and content, might influence the decision.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Schon Properties, Schon lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Rich does not equal notable. Did not find significant Urdu sources. Almost all the article is about the company anyway. Note: He is sometimes listed as Danial Schön Husain and Danial H. Schön. --Bejnar (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.