Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance cover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. After three relists there is a clear consensus that subject passes GNG. (non-admin closure) Okoslavia (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dance cover

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic; article itself little to no citations and full of original research. lullabying (talk) 02:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment perhaps redirect/merge with Choreography?-KH-1 (talk) 06:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and Music. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. Very clearly meets GNG. I've added two sources to the article and improved it a bit [1][2]. Article still needs some love. —siro χ o 03:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added a third source to the article, NYT [3] —siro χ o 03:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Several more added. —siro χ o 07:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Verging on No consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Call it a WP:HEY Keep if you want. The sources currently in the article are more than sufficient for establishing notability. I'm sure there's a lot more to be said about this trend and its history, too. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources have been found to establish notability. Consider moving to Cover dance since that's the term used in most sources. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with the move. From my little research while improving the article, "cover dance" is the activity/hobby/community/etc, whereas "dance cover" is the actual performance and/or recording, so cover dance is the broader term. We could probably just do a WP:BOLD move after the AFD closes. —siro χ o 03:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the article's current refs. Thanks for adding them, @Siroxo!

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.