Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance Gavin Dance (album)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 August 16.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Gavin Dance (album)[edit]

Per WP:MUSIC, unreleased albums are not notable without substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. None provided, none found. Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 10:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - note that duplicate article The Death Star Album also exists........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Since the title "the Death Star album" is little more than fan speculation, I've redirected it to Dance Gavin Dance (album). This might also bing in a few more !votes here. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unable to assert notability for the album per nom. Also note Untitled Dance Gavin Dance album. CultureDrone (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Untitled Dance Gavin Dance album should be the only article for this album seeming that The Death Star Album is speculation. Untitled Dance Gavin Dance album is also properly cited now. Zeropunk16 (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - however the references now cited all appear to be blogs/discussion boards, and may therefore not count as reliable independent sources. CultureDrone (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The reference on there is from Absolutepunk.net, an extremely reputable source for this type of music. web250 (talk) 17:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Actually, the source on there now is a forum thread, which is an unreliable souce no matter who hosts it. (Also, WP:MUSIC calls for substantial coverage, which the source isn't, and sources.) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both There are no good sources found for either album. The source for the main album is a forum thread and thus not reliable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TPH. Very little to go on notability wise for the moment. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 04:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an unsourced future album by a band that itself doesnt pass notability guidelines. --neon white talk 14:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.