Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova 2 (North America)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. --MrStalker (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova 2 (North America) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Fails the criteria for inclusion under WP:NOT#INFO. MrStalker (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Unique game in the series, it's messy in it's current condition but it counts as a stub. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you delete the information not allowed per WP:NOT#INFO you get one or maybe two sentences left. That's even less then a stub, and thus it should be deleted. --MrStalker (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I clicked "random articles" a few times and I've seen stubs with five words in them. However, they are verifiable and notable and therefore cannot be deleted.--WaltCip (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- An ideal stub is a couple of paragraphs open to expansion, what you don't seem to understand that a valid stub can be as small as a sentence. If that sentence says something about the article it counts. This article has a few sentences, an infobox, a list, a link to additional information, and is part of series of articles. It's not ideal, but it's not deletionist fodder either. The reason it looks lanky is because it was cut out of the main SuperNova 2 article in the first place because it didn't belong there (Different game with the same name) and I'd like to know exactly what elements in the article as it stands that are "not allowed" (The list is acceptable as a song list, see every single article about a musical album). --AeronPrometheus (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I clicked "random articles" a few times and I've seen stubs with five words in them. However, they are verifiable and notable and therefore cannot be deleted.--WaltCip (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you delete the information not allowed per WP:NOT#INFO you get one or maybe two sentences left. That's even less then a stub, and thus it should be deleted. --MrStalker (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrStalker (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. sources exist for the subject that could be used to write a better article. It should be kept and improved, not deleted. AfD isn't cleanup. Celarnor Talk to me 16:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I overhauled the stub take a second glance. It's still a stub but one would be hard pressed to find a reason to delete/merge/thumb their nose at it in its present state. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Dance videogame articles are the very lifeblood of WP. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Very well, after AeronPrometheus edits the article looks much better. Nomination withdrawn. --MrStalker (talk) 17:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.