Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Howard (contactee) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Howard (contactee)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May be a WP:FRINGEBLP. The lone RS included as a source does indeed mention the subject of the article (see [1], by David M. Jacobs), but just once. There are also hits in in-universe ufology newsletters, but we can't use those. I could not find reviews of her books to establish WP:NAUTHOR. Previous AfD was in 2009, so I think this deserves fresh consideration. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent RS, most references are to her own work. I checekd google and google scholar, nothing much came up on her. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete these pages are so frustrating. I would love to keep it as I'm sure it is interesting reading and even a good psychological study for future researchers. But we can't give Wikipedia pages to people just because they are authors. Otherwise Wikipedia would be overrun. Whomever wrote this page sadly misunderstood what notability on Wikipedia means. Sgerbic (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a very clear fail of our fringe rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.