Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Carpender

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Carpender[edit]

Dana Carpender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references on the article and it reads like self-promotion. A search for reliable sources is difficult, not notable enough. Also note this article was created by Dana Carpenter herself with 0 references, to promote herself [1]. The unsourced information has been on the article for a long time. Shocking. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 14:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 23:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable food writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am finding a handful of articles that quote her, but none that are about her. She churns our cookbooks, but I cannot find article aobut her cookbooks, or review of them.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.