Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Frantz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 02:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Frantz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been unsourced for nearly two decades. Not seeing ""significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" to meet WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Keep(?). He did have an Arena Football League career spanning a decade and there does seem to be some coverage, although none of it is particularly spectacular: HS (1994), college 1997, 1997 (p2), 1998, 1999, 1999, 2013 ("the Rush showed up with an emergency kicker, 36-year-old Dan Frantz - five years removed from his last AFL action and 24 hours removed from grilling burgers in his backyard" - hah). There's probably enough to write a BASIC-compliant article here. Thoughts @AusLondonder:? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't look at those clippings as I am still having some issues with Newspapers.com. However, here is this from 2004 and this from 2006 also. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources provided by BeanieFan11 provide the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.