Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon Tajrobehkar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Damon Tajrobehkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability criteria for WP:ATHLETE and appears only to be a vanity piece Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 14:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and I would like to add Damon Tajrobehkar-Dana to the AfD, as the creator seems to be switching the same content between the two articles perhaps in attempt to hide the fact that there is an AfD going on. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 11:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Due to multiple, apparent sock, attempts to remove the AFD tag or redirect the article to Damon Tajrobehkar-Dana, I have semi-protected the article for 1 days and the Dana redirect for a week (i.e., till after this AFD concludes). I have no opinion on the merits of the AFD itself. Abecedare (talk) 14:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.