Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Spinelli and Maxie Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of General Hospital characters. Since there are no comments suggesting this couple is notable, I have merely redirected, since most of the information is already in the target article. Black Kite (t) 01:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Spinelli and Maxie Jones[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a cut and paste from: http://soapcentral.com/gh/whoswho/damian.php?&printonly=yes Wlmg (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pending. Copyrighted cut and paste material supposedly removed.--Wlmg (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Copyright violations should be speedily deleted WP:CSD#G12, not brought to AfD. In any case, soap opera couples are not notable enough for their own article. Any useful information from this article should be merged back to List of General Hospital characters, with no redirect left behind. —SW— ^gossip 16:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The copyrighted material has been removed from the article. WP:CSD#G12 is no longer applicable. Wlmg (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: As the issues of copyvios have been addressed, however there has been insufficient discussion notability which has also been mentioned. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.