Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dami adenuga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 01:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dami adenuga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. The refs are trivial and unreliable. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : http://punchng.com/i-slept-at-the-fuel-station-to-fulfil-my-dreams-dami-adenuga/ | is a verified source. it does not fail WP:GNG but needs more source for verification, article can still be improve. --Peperu662 (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User account "Peperu662" is a newly created account, and has no edits outside the nominated article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is an easy one, when someone is a social media publicist, it is not unusual for their names to return search results, but for them to be regarded as notable; they themselves must be the subject of independent in-depth discussion in reliable sources. Can't find anything demonstrating that here. The Punch interview is not independent, and the content of the text doesn't show continued notability. There is also a strong possibility of WP:COI, and the article doesn't show WP:NPOV. HandsomeBoy (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any secondary independent WP:RS sources either. Fails WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 10:51, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.