Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalton Thrower

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. An athlete does not need to meet a sports-specific guideline if he can simply meet GNG. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dalton Thrower[edit]

Dalton Thrower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable junior hockey player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets NHOCKEY or otherwise achieves notability. DJSasso (talk) 13:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DJSasso (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • What major competition that meets WP:NHOCKEY would that be? He hasn't played a game in the NHL. Hasn't played 100 games in a minor professional league. He is a junior player who doesn't yet meet the notability requirements. -DJSasso (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails NHOCKEY. Appears that article was created in anticipation of his being a first round selection in the 2012 draft, but that never happened. Resolute 16:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: One of two hockey-related deleted prods very quietly recreated, and I can't imagine why; what notability criteria, the GNG included, did the admin in question fancy this subject meets? Ravenswing 19:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Prods are recreated immediately upon being contested unless there is a copyvio or blp vio so that isn't such a big deal. However, it would have been nice of the restorer to have let the person who did the prod know it was restored but it isn't required. -DJSasso (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – This person passes WP:BASIC and WP:GNG per: [1], [2], [3]. As such, this person warrants a stand-alone article on Wikipedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Ample of reliable sources are available, covering the subject. Easily passes WP:GNG. — Bill william comptonTalk 14:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article can always be recreated if and when he makes it to the NHL, but merely being eligible for the NHL draft while playing at the major junior level is not a sufficient claim of notability to warrant a Wikipedia article. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think anyone is suggesting keeping just because he was eligible for the NHL draft. The reasons for keeping have been based on having significant coverage in independent sources - more than a run-of-the-mill draft eligible player - and thus meeting WP:GNG. Rlendog (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dalton_Thrower&oldid=1137758154"